Ocean
Ranger Accident
Newfoundland waters, Canada, 1982
Summary
data:
Date:
February 15, 1982
Place: Around
270 kilometers east of St. John's, Newfoundland, Canada.
Type
of accident: Semi-submersible mobile offshore drilling unit
sinking
Outcome: A
huge storm caused the sinking of Ocean Ranger, killing the whole crew (84 men).
Ocean Ranger rig overview
Ocean Ranger was designed and
owned by Ocean Drilling and Exploration Company, Inc. (ODECO) of New Orleans.
The vessel was a self-propelled large semi-submersible design with a drilling
facility and living quarters. It was capable of operation beneath 1,500 feet
(460 m) of ocean water and could drill to a maximum depth of 25,000 feet (7,600
m). It was described by ODECO as the world's largest semi-submersible oil rig
to date.
Constructed for ODECO in 1976 by
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries in Hiroshima, Japan, Ocean Ranger was 396 feet (121
m) long, 262 feet (80 m) wide, and 337 feet (103 m) high. It had twelve
45,000-pound (20,000 kg) anchors. The weight was 25,000 tons. It was floating
on two 122-metre (400 ft) long pontoons that rested 24 metres (79 ft) below the
surface.
The vessel was approved for
'unrestricted ocean operations' and designed to withstand extremely harsh
conditions at sea, including 100-knot (190 km/h) winds and 110-foot (34 m)
waves. Prior to moving to the Grand Banks area in November 1980, it had operated
off the coasts of Alaska, New Jersey and Ireland.Valdez, Alaska to Los Angeles,
California, ran aground on Bligh Reef in Prince William Sound, Alaska. The vessel
was traveling outside normal shipping lanes in an
attempt to avoid ice. Within six hours of the grounding, the Exxon Valdez
spilled approximately 10.9 million gallons of its 53 million gallon cargo of
Prudhoe Bay crude oil. Eight of the eleven tanks on board were damaged.
The oil would eventually impact over 1,100 miles of
non-continuous coastline in Alaska, making the Exxon Valdez one of the
largest oil spill in U.S. waters.
What happened?
On 26 November 1981, the Ocean Ranger commenced
drilling well J-34, its third well in the Hibernia Oil Field. The Ocean Ranger
was still working on this well in February 1982 when the sinking occurred. Two
other semi-submersible rigs were also drilling nearby: the Sedco 706, 8.5 miles
(13.7 km) NNE, and the Zapata Ugland, 19.2 miles (30.9 km) N of the Ocean
Ranger.
On 14 February 1982, the rigs received reports of an
approaching storm linked to a major Atlantic cyclone from NORDCO Ltd, the
company responsible for issuing offshore weather forecasts. The usual method of
preparing for bad weather involved hanging-off the drillpipe at the sub-sea
wellhead and disconnecting the riser from the sub-sea stack. Due to surface
difficulties and the speed at which the storm developed, the crew of the Ocean
Ranger were forced to shear the drillpipe after hanging-off, after which they
disconnected the riser in the early evening.
One of the few pictures of Ocean Ranger’s sinking
(Source: Radio Canada)
(Source: Radio Canada)
At about 7 p.m (local time), the nearby Sedco 706
experienced a large, powerful wave which damaged some items on deck and
caused the loss of a life raft. Soon after, radio transmissions were heard from
the Ocean Ranger, describing a broken portlight (a porthole window) and water
in the ballast control room, with discussions on how best to repair the damage.
The Ocean Ranger reported experiencing storm seas of 55 feet, with the odd wave
up to 65 feet, thus leaving the unprotected portlight at 28 feet above mean sea
level vulnerable to wave damage. Some time after 2100 hours, radio
conversations originating on the Ocean Ranger were heard on the Sedco 706 and
Zapata Ugland, noting that valves on the Ocean Ranger's ballast control panel
appeared to be opening and closing of their own accord. The radio conversations
also discussed the 100-knot (190 km/h) winds and waves up to 65 feet (20 m)
high. Through the remainder of the evening, routine radio traffic passed
between the Ocean Ranger, its neighbouring rigs and their individual support
boats. Nothing out of the ordinary was noted.
At 00h52 (local time), on 15 February, a MAYDAY call
was sent out from the Ocean Ranger, noting a severe list to the port side of
the rig and requesting immediate assistance. This was the first communication
from the Ocean Ranger identifying a major problem. The standby vessel, the M/V
Seaforth Highlander, was requested to come in close as countermeasures against
the 10-15 degree list were proving ineffective. The onshore MOCAN supervisor
was notified of the situation, and the Canadian Coast Guard and Mobil-operated
helicopters were alerted just after 0100 hours local time. The M/V Boltentor
and the M/V Nordertor, the standby boats of the Sedco 706 and the Zapata Ugland
respectively, were also dispatched to the Ocean Ranger to provide assistance.
At 0130 hours local time, the Ocean Ranger transmitted its last message: 'There
will be no further radio communications from the Ocean Ranger. We are going to
lifeboat stations'. Shortly thereafter, in the middle of the night and in the
midst of atrocious winter weather, the crew abandoned the rig. The rig remained
afloat for another 90 minutes, sinking between 0307 and 0313 hours local time.
Whilst the rig was provided with an Emergency
Procedures Manual which detailed evacuation procedures, it is unclear how
effectively the rig evacuation was carried out. There is evidence that at least
one lifeboat was successfully launched with up to 36 crew inside, and witnesses
on the M/V Seaforth Highlander reported seeing at least 20 crew members in the
water at the same time, suggesting that at least 56 crew successfully evacuated
the rig. The United States Coast Guard report speculated that 'these men either
chose to enter the water directly or were thrown into the water as a result of
unsuccessful lifesaving equipment launching'. Rescue attempts by the standby
vessels were hampered by the adverse weather conditions and the conclusion that
the standby boats were neither equipped nor configured to rescue casualties
from a cold sea. As a result of the severe weather, the first helicopter did not
arrive on scene until 0430 hours local time, by which time most if not all of
the Ocean Ranger's crew had succumbed to hypothermia and drowned. Over the next
week, 22 bodies were recovered from the North Atlantic. Autopsies indicated
that those men had
died as a result of drowning while in a hypothermic state.
The remains of the rig itself were found by sonar
search over the following weeks, resting in an inverted position approximately
485 feet south-east of the wellhead, surrounded by major items of debris such
as the derrick. The rig had capsized bow-first, turning over and striking the
sea floor with the forward ends of the rig's pontoons.
Conclusion
The United
States Coast Guard Marine Board of Investigation report into the Ocean
Ranger sinking summarized the chain of events leading to the loss of the Ocean
Ranger as follows:
·
A
large wave appeared to cause a broken portlight;
·
The
broken portlight allowed the ingress of sea water into the ballast control
room;
·
The
ballast control panel malfunctioned or appeared to malfunction to the crew;
·
As a
result of this malfunction or perceived malfunction, several valves in the
rig's ballast control system opened due to a short-circuit, or were manually
opened by the crew;
·
The
Ocean Ranger assumed a forward list;
·
As a
result of the forward list, boarding seas began flooding the forward chain
lockers located in the forward corner support columns;
·
The
forward list worsened;
·
The
pumping of the forward tanks was not possible using the usual ballast control
method as the magnitude of the forward list created a vertical distance between
the forward tanks and the ballast pumps located astern that exceeded the
suction available on the ballast system's pumps;
·
Detailed
instructions and personnel trained in the use of the ballast control panel were
not available;
·
At
some point, the crew blindly attempted to manually operate the ballast control
panel using brass control rods;
·
At
some point, the manually operated sea valves in both pontoons were closed;
·
Progressive
flooding of the chain lockers and subsequent flooding of the upper deck
resulted in a loss of buoyancy great enough to cause the rig to capsize.
Ocean Ranger’s sketch
representing the location of the control room (number 3 on the drawing)
The Canadian
Royal Commission spent two years looking into the disaster. The commission
concluded that the Ocean Ranger had
design and construction flaws, particularly in the ballast control room,
and that the crew lacked proper safety
training, survival suits and equipment. There was no suggestion that it was
caused by a rogue wave, as some recent articles have suggested. The Canadian Royal Commission also concluded
that inspection and regulation by United States and Canadian government
agencies was ineffective.
Video / Summary:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=npPMoHz7Rgg
Sources:
·
"The Report of the Royal Commission (Canada) on
the Ocean Ranger Marine Disaster". Ottawa: Canadian Government Publishing
Centre. 1984.
Thank you for sharing your useful information. You can also refer to us Control Panel Board for Submersible Pump
ReplyDelete