AZF Accident
On 21 September 2001, just 10 days after the heinous
terrorist attacks of 9/11 in USA, it was time for the people of Toulouse in
South-West France to hear the noise of explosions but because of entirely
different reasons. An explosion that would create a crater of a depth 20 to 30
m, with a 200 m diameter.
View of the crater created after the explosion
|
PRELUDE:
The AZF site
The AZF factory in Toulouse was part of Great Parish, leading
French producer of fertilizers, a group company TotalFinaElf. It was situated
on a plot of 78 hectares, 5 kilometers from the city centre; the plant was
built between the highway leading to Tarbes and the Garonne. Built in 1924,
most of its installations dating from 1960.
The AZF plant produced mainly ammonium nitrate, ammonium
nitrate-based fertilisers and other chemicals including chlorinated compounds.
On this cursed day, the AZF factory in Toulouse employed 470
people. About 80 people, also working permanently on the site, were used by
nine external companies. The explosion occurred in a “downgraded ammonium
nitrates” store which had off-spec ammonium nitrate storage.
In the coming sections we will see how this accident led to a
series of policy changes in areas of risk management and specifications of
ammonium nitrate based fertilizers.
The
Accident Itself
Site of the disaster |
Till date the cause of the explosion has not been
pin-pointed. There have been various theories that have been hypothesized. The
major ones are that it could be a human error, a terrorist attack, an
underground explosion outside the AZF which acted as an initiator, electromagnetic
disturbances in the EDF network. The case that went for prosecution considered
this as a chemical accident where a chemical, which is a chlorine derivative ‘DCCNa’,
was mistakenly stored in the hangar that had ammonium nitrate and these two chemical
compounds reacted to lead to an explosive reaction.
Consequences
of this Accident
The explosion unfortunately killed 31 people, including 21
working in the AZF factory. More than 4500 injured have been identified. 27 000
structures were destroyed property around the plant. Compensation of more than
2 Billion Euros has been paid since the accident.
Lessons
from the accident
Even though the exact causes for the explosions have not been
figured out but this accident left a big dent on the fertilizer industry and
triggered a lot of policy changes in area of risk management.
The disasters at Toulouse reminded Europe that the
control-based Seveso II directive
(in particular its Safety Management System requirement) was not enough to
prevent major a accidents turning into disasters.
Some of the major changes are:
1) The maximum content of nitrogenous fertilisers should very
rapidly be limited to a maximum value of between 28 and 31.5% of nitrogen (80
to 90% of ammonium nitrate), which would reduce the risk of explosion and the
risk of their use as explosives.
2) The Toulouse explosion showed the need to improve our
knowledge of potential risks. The Toulouse disaster has created a strong
awareness concerning the coexistence cities industries. To address these
issues, the law of 30 July 2003 on risk prevention plans to develop “Technology
Risk Prevention Plans" (PPRT). This law puts a long-term perspective on
urban development around hazardous plants. It also gives local councillors a
stake in the risk prevention decision making process, instituting Local
Committees for Information and Dialogue (CLIC). Public opinion thus becomes involved
in decision-making, the aim being to make choices more acceptable to local
stakeholders.
3) The accident that occurred in Toulouse on the 21st of
September should lead to a re-examination of the position of many factories
that are situated in an urban environment. Based on the AZF Disaster the French
Government has put new regulations in place from July 2003. These regulations
concern new measures to improve the efficiency of future construction
limitations and to deal with existing dangerous situations of urbanism around SEVESO
sites.
4) To have the corresponding hazard studies brought up to
date (taking into account the risks of the domino effect in production
factories between ammonium nitrate stores and ammonia stores).
Sources :
2) Urban growth analysis
within a high technological risk area, Case of azf factory explosion in toulouse
(france), Casita project: www.adpc.net/casita/Case/AZF_CASE_STUDY_REPORT_v2.doc
3) Economic
and Poverty times: http://www.grida.no/files/publications/environment-times/kobetimes_1415.pdf
4) Press release:Explosion at the azf factory
in toulouse: The general inspectorate for the environment
En attendant des commentaires:
ReplyDeletehttp://www.actu-environnement.com/ae/news/responsabilite-etat-reconnue-explosion-usine-azf-17643.php4#xtor=EPR-1
Is this accident the same than the one that happened a few days ago in Texas?
ReplyDeleteJonathan
Jonathan,
ReplyDeleteit's to early to say... Come back in a year or 2...
NB: IMHO, it looks more like a burst of an ammonia tank/sphere (BLEVE), as this plant mainly stored liquid ammonia
Jean-Luc
Recent years, scientists and researches make exploitation to ultrasonic crushing technology and produced a set of ultrasonic crusher. From here: www.toption-china.com/products/ultrasonic-cell-crusher-ordinary-type. This development can improve the crushing effect of mineral stone with smoother and faster vibration.
ReplyDeleteHow come people don't know why that accident took place? It is very important to know the cause because unless you know the reason you may let it repeat again. There are many kinds of chemical reactions also which don't look like explosion but have very bad impact on the population.
ReplyDeleteRegards,
Charlie
Thanks for sharing, nice post! Post really provice useful information!
ReplyDeleteAn Thái Sơn với website anthaison.vn chuyên sản phẩm máy đưa võng hay máy đưa võng tự động tốt cho bé là địa chỉ bán máy đưa võng giá rẻ tại TP.HCM và giúp bạn tìm máy đưa võng loại nào tốt hiện nay.